Hobbit here, Hobbit there...
Nov. 22nd, 2006 12:03 pmYour daily Hobbit update. :)
A hint courtesy of
garfeimao, who's a TORN staffer, posted in reply to my entry from yesterday: "A written letter is worth a lot more than emails, it's a legal thing, they have to keep all written correspondence for a specific time period. The links include real world snail mail addresses. Make each letter you write address the specific receiving party, their place in the grand scheme of things and stay polite. But most importantly, make yourself heard." Thanks a lot!
And in case you lost the link, the addresses of New Line, MGM etc. are here.
Courtesy of TORN:
A Hobbit Flap News Roundup
A Sydney Morning Herald article: Jackson's sidelining raises ire of Shire fans
And saving the best for last... Dork Tower Rips New Line A New One ROTFLMAO!!! Thank you John Kovalic for expressing what we can not put into our letters/e-mails to New Line! :D
Do keep an eye on TheOneRing.net - they're the ones with the best information, and almost everything I post here is gleamed from them.
Also, something that was pointed out by someone in
primulabaggins' LJ: The current issue of German CINEMA magazine (issue #343, 12/06) has an interview with Saul Zaentz, and at the end of it they asked him about LOTR/The Hobbit. He reveals a few pieces of information which I've never heard before! Here's my translation - apologies if the English isn't the best, I'm a bit in a hurry:
For decades you held the film rights to "The Lord of the Rings". Why did you pass on production?
In the 70s I produced the animated adaptation of the first book, and wasn't happy with the result. Computer animation didn't exist back then, so it wasn't possible to do better. Already in the 80s I met Peter Jackson, and immediately had him contractually fixed as director for potential live action movies, because no one had a better grip on Tolkien's novels than him. When my company gave the rights to New Line, because we aren't equipped for productions of this size, New Line honoured that. And therefore I now earn more from the profits of Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" than from other films. Although I've never set foot on the set in New Zealand.
What about the eagerly awaited adaptation of "The Hobbit"?
It will definitely be made by Peter Jackson. The only question is when. He wants to shoot another film first. Next year the rights to "The Hobbit" fall back to my company. I assume that Peter will wait this long, because he'll get the best deal in the business from us. He too is fed up with the studios: He had to sue New Line for his share of the profits. (sorry, can't remember the correct term right now - ODQ) With us on the other hand, he knows that he'll be paid fairly and that he'll get unconditional artistic support.
Very interesting - and I'd love to hear what Mr. Zaentz has to say about the current situation!
A hint courtesy of
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
And in case you lost the link, the addresses of New Line, MGM etc. are here.
Courtesy of TORN:
A Hobbit Flap News Roundup
A Sydney Morning Herald article: Jackson's sidelining raises ire of Shire fans
And saving the best for last... Dork Tower Rips New Line A New One ROTFLMAO!!! Thank you John Kovalic for expressing what we can not put into our letters/e-mails to New Line! :D
Do keep an eye on TheOneRing.net - they're the ones with the best information, and almost everything I post here is gleamed from them.
Also, something that was pointed out by someone in
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
For decades you held the film rights to "The Lord of the Rings". Why did you pass on production?
In the 70s I produced the animated adaptation of the first book, and wasn't happy with the result. Computer animation didn't exist back then, so it wasn't possible to do better. Already in the 80s I met Peter Jackson, and immediately had him contractually fixed as director for potential live action movies, because no one had a better grip on Tolkien's novels than him. When my company gave the rights to New Line, because we aren't equipped for productions of this size, New Line honoured that. And therefore I now earn more from the profits of Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" than from other films. Although I've never set foot on the set in New Zealand.
What about the eagerly awaited adaptation of "The Hobbit"?
It will definitely be made by Peter Jackson. The only question is when. He wants to shoot another film first. Next year the rights to "The Hobbit" fall back to my company. I assume that Peter will wait this long, because he'll get the best deal in the business from us. He too is fed up with the studios: He had to sue New Line for his share of the profits. (sorry, can't remember the correct term right now - ODQ) With us on the other hand, he knows that he'll be paid fairly and that he'll get unconditional artistic support.
Very interesting - and I'd love to hear what Mr. Zaentz has to say about the current situation!