Mr. Morrison (who I don't know squat about, besides this article) makes a few good points and he does include a surprising amount of info about fan fiction and its variations, but they're pretty much outweighed by the boatload of errors and misconceptions his article is peppered with:
In the beginning, there was fan fiction: from the four gospels to Fifty Shades by Ewan Morrison - guardian.co.uk
Some examples:
Interestingly, by outshining the heroes Mary Sues reveal a lurking contempt on behalf of their fan writers towards the original characters.
- Or maybe it just reflects the writers' desire to be (super)heroines, so for once they get to save the day and get the guy? You know, like boys imagining they're superheroes?
( Read more... )
Also, Mr. Morrison's claim that writers before the invention of copyright can not be considered 'authors' (and therefore derivative works based on works of those writers can not be considered fan fiction) is ridiculous. (Besides - what applies once a work falls back into the public domain?) The only thing that changed was that suddenly writers had an exclusive right to the characters and worlds they created. But just like in the time before copyright, it is still a fact that no writer creates in a vacuum/comes up with something truly 'original' - all stories are in some way built on stories/archetypes/settings that have come before! The mark of a good writer is to combine those elements in a way that captures readers.
/rant
In the beginning, there was fan fiction: from the four gospels to Fifty Shades by Ewan Morrison - guardian.co.uk
Some examples:
Interestingly, by outshining the heroes Mary Sues reveal a lurking contempt on behalf of their fan writers towards the original characters.
- Or maybe it just reflects the writers' desire to be (super)heroines, so for once they get to save the day and get the guy? You know, like boys imagining they're superheroes?
( Read more... )
Also, Mr. Morrison's claim that writers before the invention of copyright can not be considered 'authors' (and therefore derivative works based on works of those writers can not be considered fan fiction) is ridiculous. (Besides - what applies once a work falls back into the public domain?) The only thing that changed was that suddenly writers had an exclusive right to the characters and worlds they created. But just like in the time before copyright, it is still a fact that no writer creates in a vacuum/comes up with something truly 'original' - all stories are in some way built on stories/archetypes/settings that have come before! The mark of a good writer is to combine those elements in a way that captures readers.
/rant